|
BRIEF SUMMARY
Since the discovery, in the late 1970s, of the presence of nitrosamines in dinitroanilines, much effort has been directed to the removal of nitrosamines. See, e.g. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,127,610; 4,185,035; and 4,226,789. However, it has now been discovered that the removal of nitrosamines does not necessarily eradicate all residual nitrosating species; therefore, a dinitroaniline which shows only a negligible nitrosamine content may subsequently develop a higher nitrosamine level. Circumstances which favor nitrosamine formation, notably elevated temperatures, present a special problem; yet reheating of a dinitroaniline may be necessary to achieve desired formulations. Therefore, a method is needed to stabilize dinitroanilines against subsequent nitrosamine formation.
The present invention is directed to a method of stabilizing dinitroanilines against the formation of nitrosamines, by the incorporation of an addition compound of a bisulfite with an aldehyde or ketone. The present invention is also directed to the ensuing combinations of a dinitroaniline and the addition compound of bisulfite and aldehyde or ketone.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
In more detail, the present invention is directed to a process for stabilizing a dinitroaniline herbicide against the formation of nitrosamines, which process comprises adding to the dinitroaniline herbicide while in molten state an effective amount of an addition comound of a bisulfite and an aldehyde or ketone.
The dinitroaniline herbicides are a well-known class of compounds. Dinitroanilines with which the present invention can be practiced (and their generic names) are
4-trifluoromethyl-2,6-dinitro-N,N-di-n-propylaniline (trifluralin);
4-isopropyl-2,6-dinitro-N,N-di-n-propylaniline (isopropalin);
4-trifluoromethyl-2,6-dinitro-N-n-butyl-N-ethylaniline (benefin);
4-trifluoromethyl-2,6-dinitro-N-ethyl-N-methallylaniline (ethalfuralin);
4-tert-butyl-2,6-dinitro-N-sec-butylaniline (butralin);
3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitro-N-(1-ethylpropyl)aniline (pendimethalin);
4-trifluoromethyl-2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-N-(2-chloroethyl)aniline (fluchloralin);
4-trifluoromethyl-2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-N-(cyclopropylmethyl)aniline (profluralin);
4-trifluoromethyl-2,6-dinitro-3-amino-N,N-diethylaniline (dinitramine);
4-methyl-2,6-dinitro-N,N-bis(2-chloroethyl)aniline (chlornidine);
4-sulfamoyl-2,6-dinitro-N,N-di-n-propylaniline (oryzalin);
4-(methylsulfonyl)-2,6-dinitro-N,N-di-n-propylaniline (nitralin);
N-((4-dipropylamino)-3,5-dinitrophenyl)sulfonyl)-S,S-dimethylsulfilimine (prosulfalin);
4-(trifluoromethyl)-3-amino-2,6-dinitro-N,N-di-n-propylaniline (prodiamine).
Preferred dinitroanilines with which the present invention is carried out are trifluralin, pendimethalin and fluchloralin.
Stabilization of a dinitroaniline herbicide in accordance with the present invention can be carried out with a dinitroaniline alone or with a combination of a dinitroaniline and another herbicide. As examples of other herbicides that are combined with dinitroanilines, there may be mentioned carbamates such as diallate, chlorpropham, and triallate, and triazines such as ametryn, atrazine, cyanazine, dipropetryn, metribuzin, prometon, prometryn, secbumeton, terbutryn and the like. Combinations of a dinitroaniline herbicide with a triazine which confers a higher melting temperature on the combination are especially helped by treatment in accordance with the present invention, since higher temperatures are believed to favor nitrosamine formation. Examples of such combinations are the combinations of trifluralin with either metribuzin or cyanazine.
The nitrosamine-inhibiting agent in accordance with the present invention is an addition compound of an alkali metal or ammonium bisulfite and an aldehyde or ketone. The formation of such addition compounds is well known and is described in numerous references, of which "Advanced Organic Chemistry" by Fieser and Fieser, pg. 416 et seq. (Reinhold Corp., New York, N.Y. 1962) is exemplary. The reaction proceeds as follows: ##STR1## The ensuing addition products are generally crystalline salts. The scope of the reaction is dependent on the identity of the aldehyde or ketone. In general, bulkiness of the group or groups present in addition to the aldehyde or ketone function inhibits the reaction, and where the functional group is severely hindered, the reaction does not take place. Since aldehydes by definition contain hydrogen, most aldehydes will react; many methyl ketones also undergo the reaction. Higher aliphatic ketones are less likely to undergo the reaction. However, any addition compound which forms is believed to be effective for nitrosamine inhibition in accordance with the present invention.
Preferred addition compounds are those derived from an alkali metal or ammonium bisulfite and an aldehyde or ketones of the formula ##STR2## wherein R.sup.1 and R.sup.2 ( 1) are taken separately and
(a) R.sup.1 represents hydrogen or methyl, and R.sup.2 represents hydrogen or lower alkyl of C.sub.1 -C.sub.3, or
(b) R.sup.1 represents hydrogen and R.sup.2 represents phenyl, 2-phenylvinyl, or benzyl; or
(2) are taken together and constitute, with the carbonyl function, a cycloalkanone containing from 5 to 8 carbon atoms.
Representative aldehydes and ketones include:
formaldehyde
acetaldehyde
propionaldehyde
butyraldehyde
benzaldehyde
cinnamaldehyde
phenylacetaldehyde
acetone
methyl ethyl ketone
methyl propyl ketone
methyl butyl ketone
methyl isobutyl ketone
methyl tert-butyl ketone
cyclopentanone
cyclohexanone
cyclooctanone
Aldehydes and ketones which, because of cost and availability, are preferred include formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, propionaldehyde, benzaldehyde, phenylacetaldehyde, cinnamaldehyde, acetone, methyl isobutyl ketone, and cyclohexanone. Of these, the most preferred are acetone and cyclohexanone.
Suitable bisulfites in preparing the present addition compounds include sodium bisulfite, potassium bisulfite, and ammonium bisulfite. Of these, the preferred compound is sodium bisulfite.
The amount of the nitrosamine inhibitor to be employed in accordance with the present invention is not critical and will vary with such factors as the identity of the dinitroaniline, the amount, if any, of residual nitrosating species, the severity of intended subsequent conditions, and the like. In general, the present nitrosamine inhibitor is effective when present in a concentration ranging from 0.01 to 10.0 percent of the dinitroaniline, by weight. A preferred concentration is from 0.1 to 2.0 percent.
In carrying out the present invention, the present nitrosamine inhibitor is added to the dinitroaniline while in a molten state. The addition may be made as a later step in the production of the dinitroaniline; or the dinitroaniline may be subsequently remelted and the present nitrosamine inhibitor added. The former is preferred, since it confers maximum protection against nitrosamine generation. After addition of the nitrosamine inhibitor at either stage, the dinitroaniline and nitrosamine inhibitor are mixed thoroughly to insure uniform distribution of the nitrosamine inhibitor.
Dinitroaniline treated in accordance with the present invention are resistant to nitrosamine generation, even under elevated temperatures or other conditions which would normally conduce to nitrosamine formation.
The following examples illustrate the present invention and will enable those skilled in the art to practice the same. All analyses for nitrosamine were conducted on a Thermal Energy Analyzer (TEA), Model 502 TEA-GC, manufactured by Thermo-Electron Corporation, Waltham, Mass.
EXAMPLE 1: UNTREATED TRIFLURALIN, NITROSAMINE GENERATION ON HEATING
Trifluralin of a lot "A" was purified and thereafter heated. Purification was carried out as follows.
The lot A trifluralin was recrystallized from Skelly B. The resulting orange crystalline solid was then dissolved in 600 ml. of benzene and washed in sequence with five 600-ml. portions of 2N hydrochloric acid, two 600-ml. portions of water, two 600-ml. portions of 10% aqueous sodium bicarbonate solution, and two 600-ml. portions of water. The washed benzene layer was dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate and filtered, and benzene was stripped in vacuo. The resulting trifluralin was redissolved in a small volume (about 50 ml.) of fresh benzene, and this solution was put on a Fluorisil column (wet with hexane). The trifluralin was eluted with about 4.5-5 liters of hexane, and the hexane stripped. A residual red oil crystallized on standing, and the material was recrystallized from Skelly "B".
The resulting purified trifluralin, an orange crystalline solid, was heated at 150.degree. C. with stirring; samples were withdrawn periodically and analyzed for nitrosamine content; NDPA (nitrosodipropylamine), and C.sub.5, C.sub.6, C.sub.7, and C.sub.8 nitrosamine. Results for NDPA were as set forth in the following table.
TABLE 1
______________________________________
Time NDPA, PPM
______________________________________
0 None detected at test
sensitivity of a 0.02 ppm
30 min. 0.03
1 hr. 0.04
2 hrs. 0.06
3 hrs. 0.1
4 hrs. 0.13
5 hrs. 0.18
6 hrs. 0.18
______________________________________
No C.sub.5, C.sub.6, C.sub.7, and C.sub.8 nitrosamine was detected in any of the samples. The 0-time sample was also analyzed for dipropylamine; none was detected (detection limit of 0.5 ppm).
EXAMPLE 2: FORMALDEHYDE SODIUM BISULFITE ADDITION COMPOUND, IN TRIFLURALIN
In a first series of tests, portions of a lot of trifluralin, lot "A", were evaluated for the increase in nitrosamine content on heating, with and without a nitrosamine inhibitor in accordance with the present invention.
A first portion of lot A was heated, with stirring, in a wax bath maintained at 110.degree. C. Samples were withdrawn at intervals and submitted for nitrosamine analysis. Results were as follows.
TABLE II
______________________________________
Nitrosamine Found (ppm)
Time C.sub.5
C.sub.6 NDPA C.sub.7
C.sub.8
Total
______________________________________
0 0.07 0.15 0.45 0.39 0.21 1.27
30 min.
0.06 0.14 0.47 0.38 0.18 1.23
1 hr. 0.08 0.15 0.52 0.40 0.19 1.34
2 hrs. 0.12 0.17 0.52 0.39 0.20 1.40
3 hrs. 0.13 0.14 0.58 0.39 0.19 1.43
4 hrs. 0.16 0.14 0.67 0.40 0.19 1.56
5 hrs. 0.16 0.15 0.70 0.40 0.19 1.60
6 hrs. 0.19 0.16 0.73 0.37 0.18 1.63
______________________________________
Another portion of lot A of trifluralin was evaluated in the same way except that the temperature was 150.degree. C. with the following results:
TABLE III
______________________________________
Nitrosamine Found (ppm)
Time C.sub.5
C.sub.6 NDPA C.sub.7
C.sub.8
Total
______________________________________
0 0.06 0.19 0.42 0.37 0.18 1.22
30 min.
0.45 0.18 1.32 0.42 0.19 2.56
1 hr. 1.87 ND* 4.82 0.45 0.19 7.33
2 hrs.
3.15 ND 8.37 0.50 0.19 12.21
3 hrs.
3.49 ND 10.0 0.48 0.18 14.15
4 hrs.
3.36 ND 10.40 0.45 0.19 14.40
5 hrs.
3.40 ND 10.81 0.49 0.19 14.89
6 hrs.
3.31 ND 10.98 0.49 0.18 14.96
______________________________________
*Manual attenuation of the instrument resulted in a loss of the signal fo
the C.sub.6 nitrosamine.
A third 99-gram portion of lot A of trifluralin was melted and 1 gram of the formaldehyde sodium bisulfite addition compound (purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co.) was added. The mixture was then heated at 150.degree. C. and samples were withdrawn at intervals and submitted for nitrosamine analysis. Results were as follows:
TABLE IV
______________________________________
Total
Time NDPA (ppm) Nitrosamines (ppm)
______________________________________
0 0.54 1.28
30 min. 0.65 1.60
1 hr. 0.53 1.22
2 hrs. 0.59 1.37
3 hrs. 0.49 1.12
4 hrs. 0.60 1.32
5 hrs. 0.50 1.13
6 hrs. 0.49 1.09
______________________________________
EXAMPLE 3: FORMALDEHYDE SODIUM BISULFITE ADDITION COMPOUND, DIFFERING LEVELS, IN TRIFLURALIN
Portions of a second lot of technical trifluralin, lot "B", were also evaluated for the increase in nitrosamine content on heating, with and without differing levels of formaldehyde sodium bisulfite addition compound. In this series, all portions were heated to 150.degree. C., with stirring, and samples removed periodically and analyzed, for nitrosodipropylamine only. Results were as follows.
TABLE V
______________________________________
PPM of NDPA at Indicated Percent of
Formaldehyde Sodium Bisulfite Addition Compound
0
Time (Control) 1.0 0.5 0.1 0.05
______________________________________
0 0.4 0.42 0.33 0.35 0.34
30 min.
2.05 2.02 1.84 1.49 1.17
1 hr. 4.82 2.61 2.92 2.26 2.97
2 hrs.
7.36 2.97 3.09 4.01 5.19
3 hrs.
9.42 3.15 3.47 4.93 5.76
4 hrs.
10.04 3.53 3.24 4.84 5.60
5 hrs.
10.45 3.82 3.51 5.11 6.62
6 hrs.
9.74 3.74 3.01 4.70 6.63
______________________________________
EXAMPLE 4: CYCLOHEXANONE SODIUM BISULFITE ADDITION COMPOUND, IN TRIFLURALIN
Lot B of trifluralin was employed for the evaluation of the cyclohexanone sodium bisulfite addition compound. The evaluation was carried out as reported in Example 3 except that only one level of addition compound was tested, 1.0 percent. Results were as follows:
TABLE VI
______________________________________
Time NDPA, PPM
______________________________________
0 0.35
30 min.
0.31
1 hr. 0.42
2 hrs.
0.44
3 hrs.
0.55
4 hrs.
0.52
5 hrs.
0.82
6 hrs.
0.88
______________________________________
EXAMPLE 5: CYCLOHEXANONE SODIUM BISULFITE ADDITION COMPOUND, DIFFERING LEVELS, IN TRIFLURALIN
Additional portions of technical trifluralin, lot B, were evaluated for the increase in nitrosamine content on heating, with and without differing levels of cyclohexanone sodium bisulfite addition compound. The evaluations were carried out as described in Example 3, with the following results:
TABLE VII
______________________________________
PPM of NDPA at Indicated Percent of
Cyclohexanone Sodium Bisulfite Addition Compound
0
Time (Control) 1.0 0.5 0.1 0.05
______________________________________
0 0.35 0.31 0.33 0.31 0.34
30 min.
1.72 0.31 0.31 0.32 0.39
1 hr. 4.22 0.37 0.37 0.48 0.68
2 hrs.
7.30 0.33 0.72 0.53 0.79
3 hrs.
9.04 0.4I 0.87 0.57 1.04
4 hrs.
9.79 0.41 1.06 0.90 1.64
5 hrs.
10.51 0.48 1.24 1.59 3.83
6 hrs.
10.84 0.51 1.26 1.95 4.85
______________________________________
EXAMPLE 6: ACETONE SODIUM BISULFITE ADDITION COMPOUND, DIFFERING LEVELS, IN TRIFLURALIN
Additional portions of technical trifluralin, lot B, were evaluated for the increase in nitrosamine content on heating, with and without differing levels of acetone sodium bisulfite addition compound. The evaluations were carried out as described in Example 3, with the following results.
TABLE VIII
______________________________________
PPM of NDPA at Indicated Percent of
Acetone Sodium Bisulfite Addition Compound
0
Time (Control) 1.0 0.5 0.1 0.05
______________________________________
0 0.34 0.33 0.33 0.32 0.37
30 min.
2.06 0.36 0.37 0.65 1.43
1 hr. 4.35 0.38 0.51 0.99 1.88
2 hrs.
7.13 0.35 0.63 1.25 2.12
3 hrs.
8.71 0.38 0.86 1.65 3.00
4 hrs.
9.72 0.41 0.97 2.21 4.05
5 hrs.
10.65 0.41 1.05 2.92 4.50
6 hrs.
11.15 0.40 1.03 3.65 6.50
______________________________________
EXAMPLES 7-12: SODIUM BISULFITE ADDITION COMPOUNDS OF VARIOUS ALDEHYDES AND KETONES, IN TRIFLURALIN
Various sodium bisulfite addition compounds were evaluated for their inhibition of nitrosamine formation upon heating of technical trifluralin, lot B. The procedures were those described in Example 3, except that only a single level was evaluated. Results were as described in the following table.
TABLE IX
__________________________________________________________________________
PPM of NDPA Employing 1 Percent of
Addition Compound of Sodium
Bisulfite and Indicated Aldehyde or Ketone
Methyl Methyl
Ethyl
Benzal-
Cinnamal-
Propional-
Isobutyl
Phenyl-
Time Control
Ketone
dehyde
dehyde
dehyde
Ketone
Acetaldehyde
__________________________________________________________________________
0 0.36 0.43
0.37 0.35 0.34 0.37 0.31
30
min.
1.63 0.34
1.01 0.99 0.59 0.93 0.34
1 hr.
3.28 0.43
1.01 0.68 1.40 1.13 0.26
2 hrs.
4.49 0.55
0.71 0.77 1.09 1.04 0.33
3 hrs.
4.53 0.56
0.87 0.93 1.17 1.02 0.28
4 hrs.
4.16 0.45
0.84 0.86 1.17 0.94 0.24
5 hrs.
4.20 0.44
0.96 1.01 1.40 1.00 0.23
6 hrs.
3.70 0.48
0.96 1.14 1.54 0.97 0.20
__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLES 13-14: METHYL ETHYL KETONE ADDITION COMPOUNDS OF VARIOUS BISULFITES, IN TRIFLURALIN
Addition compounds of methyl ethyl ketone with potassium and ammonium bisulfite were evaluated for their inhibition of nitrosamine formation upon heating of technical trifluralin, lot B. The procedures were those described in Example 3, except that only a single level was evaluated. Results were as described in the following table.
TABLE X
______________________________________
PPM of NDPA Employing 1 Percent
of Indicated Addition Compound
Addition Compound
Addition Compound
With Potassium With Ammonium
Time Control Bisulfite Bisulfite
______________________________________
0 0.26 0.35 0.28
30 min.
1.34 0.51 0.68
1 hr. 2.08 0.82 1.39
2 hrs.
3.64 0.84 2.19
3 hrs.
3.68 0.97 1.93
4 hrs.
4.58 1.03 2.04
5 hrs.
4.11 0.97 2.47
6 hrs.
3.49 0.92 2.33
______________________________________
EXAMPLE 15: METHYL ETHYL KETONE SODIUM BISULFITE ADDITION COMPOUND, IN BENEFIN
A mixture of 99 grams of benefin and 1 gram of methyl ethyl ketone sodium bisulfite addition compound was heated at 150.degree. C. Samples were withdrawn at intervals and analyzed for butylethylnitrosamine (BENA).
A sample of the same lot of benefin was heated without any additive. Samples were also withdrawn at the same intervals and analyzed for BENA, C-5 and C-6 nitrosamines, and total nitrosamine content. Results were as set forth in the following table.
TABLE XI
______________________________________
PPM of Indicated Nitrosamine
1 Percent of Methyl Ethyl
Ketone Sodium Bisulfite
No Additive (Control)
Addition Compound
Time BENA C-5 C-6 Total BENA
______________________________________
0 0.11 -- -- 0.11 0.07
30 min.
0.15 -- 0.09 0.24 0.3
1 hr. 0.71 0.15 0.47 1.33 0.28
2 hrs.
1.1 0.11 0.43 1.64 0.26
3 hrs.
1.64 0.14 0.54 2.32 0.38
4 hrs.
2.51 0.24 0.67 3.42 0.43
5 hrs.
2.86 0.24 0.68 3.78 0.46
6 hrs.
3.01 0.20 0.59 3.80 0.34
______________________________________
EXAMPLE 16: METHYL ETHYL KETONE SODIUM BISULFITE ADDITION COMPOUND, IN ETHALFLURALIN
The procedures of Example 15 were repeated with ethalfluralin instead of benefin, and with analysis for ethylmethallylnitrosamine (EMANA) and, in the case of control, C-8 nitrosamines and total nitrosamines. Results were as set forth in the following table.
TABLE XII
______________________________________
PPM of Indicated Nitrosamine
1 percent of Methyl Ethyl
Ketone Sodium Bisulfite
No Additive (Control)
Addition Compound
Time EMANA C-8 Total EMANA
______________________________________
0 0.63 0.11 0.74 1.22
30 min.
4.64 0.52 5.16 7.34
1 hr. 18.2 2.89 21.09 2.56
2 hrs.
24.5 2.99 27.49 6.39
3 hrs.
24.4 3.87 28.27 7.64
4 hrs.
23.1 3.10 26.2 7.19
5 hrs.
19.3 3.57 22.87 6.92
6 hrs.
21.6 3.04 24.64 6.55
______________________________________
EXAMPLE 17: ACETONE SODIUM BISULFITE ADDITION COMPOUND, IN TRIFLURALIN
Crystalline acetone sodium bisulfite addition compound (3 grams) was added to molten technical trifluralin, lot B (297 grams), providing a 1 percent concentration of the addition compound. The mixture was stirred slowly and heated in a wax bath maintained at 70.degree. C. Samples were withdrawn at intervals and analyzed for NDPA content. A control was also run. Results were as follows:
TABLE XIII
______________________________________
PPM of NDPA
No Additive
1 Percent Acetone Sodium
Time (Control) Bisulfite Addition Compound
______________________________________
0 0.50 0.55
1 hr. 0.46 0.54
2 hrs. 0.39 0.49
4 hrs. 0.45 0.51
8 hrs. 0.49 0.53
24 hrs. 0.45 0.54
48 hrs. 0.32 0.51
72 hrs. 0.46 0.50
______________________________________
Although these data indicate little nitrosamine formation, they should be compared with Example 2. It is believed that nitrosamine formation is accelerated with increasing temperatures, and that 70.degree. C. does not enhance nitrosamine formation much beyond ambient temperatures.
EXAMPLES 18-19
Evaluations of two of the present nitrosamine inhibitors, acetone sodium bisulfite addition compound and cyclohexanone sodium bisulfite addition compound, were repeated. Trifluralin of a lot "C" was employed in these evaluations. Portions of the trifluralin, alone or with one of the additives, were heated to 110.degree. C.; samples were withdrawn periodically and analyzed for NDPA. Results were as shown in the following tables.
A first evaluation compared acetone sodium bisulfite addition compound with cyclohexanone sodium bisulfite addition compound at equivalent mole percents.
TABLE XIV
______________________________________
PPM of NDPA With Indicaied Addition Compound
1.2 Percent by Weight
1.0 Percent by Weight
(2.0 mole percent) of
(2 mole percent) of
Cyclohexanone
Time Con- Acetone Sodium Bisul-
Sodium Bisulfite
(Hours)
trol fite Addition Compound
Addition Compound
______________________________________
0 1.0 0.80 0.95 0.87 0.97
3 0.9 0.92 1.0 0.59 0.81
19 2.6 1.3 1.1 0.94 1.0
27 3.6 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0
43 4.7 1.3 1.3 1.1 0.79
______________________________________
A second evaluation repeated the comparison, but with two different levels.
TABLE XV
__________________________________________________________________________
PPM of NDPA With Indicated Addition Compound
Acetone Sodium Bisulfite
Cyclohexanone Sodium Bisulfite
Addition Compound Addition Compound
0.05 percent
5.0 percent
0.06 percent
6.0 percent
Time by Weight
by Weight by Weight
by Weight
(Hours)
Control
(0.1 mole percent)
(10.0 mole percent)
(0.1 mole percent)
(10.0 mole percent)
__________________________________________________________________________
0 0.99
0.89 1.0 1.0 0.72
3 1.2 0.85 1.1 1.2 0.71
20 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 0.29
27 2.6 1.2 1.1 2.0 0.67
43 3.4 1.2 0.56 2.6 0.35
__________________________________________________________________________
A third evaluation again compared the two addition compounds, at two
different levels, and with two different sources of one of the addition
compounds.
TABLE XVI
__________________________________________________________________________
PPM of NDPA With Indicated Addition Compound
Acetone Sodium
Acetone Sodium
Bisulfite Addi-
Bisulfite Addi-
Cyclohexanone
tion Compound,
tion Compound,
Sodium Bisul-
Non-Commer-
Commercial fite Addition
cial Source
Source Compound
0.05 Percent
0.05 Percent
1.0 Percent
0.06 Percent
1.2 Percent
By Weight
by Weight
by Weight
by Weight
by Weight
Time (0.1 mole
(0.1 mole
(2.0 mole
(0.1 mole
(2.0 mole
(Hours)
Control
Percent) Percent)
Percent)
Percent)
Percent)
__________________________________________________________________________
0 0.48
0.55 0.58 0.52 0.42 0.47
7 1.6 1.3 0.42 0.52 0.24 0.58
23 1.5 1.3 0.96 0.47 0.83 0.15
31 4.3 1.8 1.7 0.60 0.66 0.49
48 5.2 8.0 3.8 0.62 1.7 0.40
48* 6.1 5.6 4.3 0.53 2.0 0.44
__________________________________________________________________________
*Reassay of sample.
EXAMPLE 20: PREPARATION OF ACETONE SODIUM BISULFITE ADDITION COMPOUND
Reagent grade acetone (58 grams; 1.0 mole) was added slowly to a saturated aqueous sodium bisulfite solution (200 ml.). The reaction mixture became warm during the addition, and after the addition of about half of the acetone, a crystalline precipitate began to form. After addition of the acetone was complete, the reaction mixture was stirred for a few minutes, stoppered and allowed to cool to room temperature. The reaction mixture was maintained at room temperature overnight (about 18 hours), then 200 ml. of ethanol was added, the solid material broken up, then collected by suction filtration. The solid material was washed on the filter with two 100-ml. portions of cold ethanol, then with diethyl ether and air dried at room temperature. The resulting material was a white crystalline solid. The identity of the product was confirmed by NMR; the NMR spectrum was in agreement with the spectrum given in the Sadtler NMR collection for the same compound, spectrum 16891M.
|
|
